🔗 Share this article

When I am a Dungeon Master, I historically avoided extensive use of luck during my Dungeons & Dragons sessions. I preferred was for narrative flow and what happened in a game to be guided by deliberate decisions as opposed to the roll of a die. Recently, I opted to alter my method, and I'm very pleased with the outcome.

The Inspiration: Watching a Custom Mechanic

A well-known streamed game utilizes a DM who regularly asks for "chance rolls" from the players. The process entails choosing a specific dice and outlining consequences based on the roll. While it's at its core no unlike consulting a random table, these get invented in the moment when a course of events lacks a predetermined conclusion.

I decided to try this method at my own game, mainly because it seemed interesting and provided a change from my standard routine. The experience were fantastic, prompting me to reconsider the ongoing dynamic between planning and improvisation in a tabletop session.

An Emotional In-Game Example

In a recent session, my party had concluded a large-scale battle. Afterwards, a player inquired after two key NPCs—a brother and sister—had lived. In place of picking a fate, I let the dice decide. I asked the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The possible results were: a low roll, both were killed; a middling roll, a single one would die; a high roll, they both lived.

The die came up a 4. This triggered a deeply poignant scene where the characters came upon the corpses of their companions, forever clasped together in death. The group performed a ceremony, which was particularly powerful due to earlier character interactions. As a parting gesture, I improvised that the remains were miraculously transformed, containing a spell-storing object. I rolled for, the bead's magical effect was precisely what the group lacked to solve another major quest obstacle. It's impossible to plan this type of magical moments.

Improving On-the-Spot Skills

This event led me to ponder if chance and making it up are actually the core of D&D. Although you are a detail-oriented DM, your ability to adapt can rust. Groups frequently take delight in ignoring the most carefully laid plans. Therefore, a effective DM must be able to think quickly and create scenarios on the fly.

Employing similar mechanics is a fantastic way to develop these talents without straying too much outside your preparation. The strategy is to deploy them for minor situations that won't drastically alter the session's primary direction. As an example, I wouldn't use it to establish if the king's advisor is a secret enemy. However, I would consider using it to determine if the party arrive just in time to see a critical event unfolds.

Empowering Player Agency

This technique also works to make players feel invested and cultivate the feeling that the story is alive, evolving based on their decisions in real-time. It combats the feeling that they are merely actors in a pre-written narrative, thereby bolstering the cooperative nature of the game.

This approach has long been part of the original design. Original D&D were reliant on charts, which made sense for a game focused on treasure hunting. Even though modern D&D often prioritizes story and character, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, this isn't always the only path.

Striking the Healthy Equilibrium

It is perfectly nothing wrong with doing your prep. But, equally valid nothing wrong with letting go and allowing the whim of chance to guide minor details in place of you. Direction is a big aspect of a DM's role. We require it to facilitate play, yet we often struggle to release it, at times when doing so might improve the game.

The core advice is this: Have no fear of temporarily losing your plan. Embrace a little randomness for inconsequential story elements. The result could discover that the surprising result is significantly more memorable than anything you might have pre-written on your own.